In a month’s time, our management team will be heading to Barcelona in Spain to take part in the 63rd ICANN meeting from 20–25 October.
This should be a policy focused event, as this meeting includes a ‘High-Level Government Meeting (HLGM)’ section, which takes place every two years in the current ICANN schedule.
HLGMs reinforce the critical role that governments play in providing advice to the ICANN Board on public policy relating to the secure and stable functioning of the Domain Name System. They also give participants an opportunity to discuss at a very senior level the current public policy issues and challenges at ICANN.
We’ll also be meeting with colleagues from around the world who work primarily in the internet governance, domain name and DNS space.
As always, ICANN meetings are free to anyone with an interest, including invididuals, so if you are remotely interested in the inner workings of the internet, they provide a rare unfettered glimpse for anyone who wants to learn more. Join us if you can, or watch this blog for our post-meeting analysis and report.
The European data protection authorities have expressed concern over the unlimited publication of personal data of domain name registrants in the WHOIS. Typically at the moment when you register a new domain name you are bombarded with marketing calls and emails for a week or more.
Starting this week, you’ll see that the data on WHOIS for domains owned by EEA registrants is getting masked. This masking process is automated, will be ongoing and will be completed across all relevant domains on the platform.
For all existing domain names, if either of the Registrant, Admin, Tech and/or Billing contacts is identified as being from the EU, we will mask the WHOIS output for that domain name with placeholder details in place of the users’ personal information (this service will be referred to as “GDPR WHOIS Protection”).
Here’s an example of how the changes will look on a typical .COM domain name:
Some domain extensions are using their own interpretation of the GDPR so there are varying levels of masking in these domains (.UK is such an example).
Also to note that: access to personal data of domain name registrants may be granted when such access is necessary for technical reasons such as for the facilitation of transfers, or for law enforcement when it is legally entitled to such access.
Domains that have a paid-for “Privacy Protection” service will still enjoy this service – it has the important difference that enquiries using the web form/email address given in the Privacy Protection on the WHOIS will be forwarded to the Registrant. This is not the case (nor possible) on the GDPR masked domains.
Today is the day Londoners elect a new mayor, and we thought it would be interesting to look at the candidates’ choice of domain names, and see if any patterns emerge.
Here are the candidates and their domain names:
London Mayor Elections 2016
Minds + Machines
*Site is part of candidate’s business website.
Some candidates have not registered a domain specifically for their campaign, so we can’t really draw conclusions from these (unless perhaps they’re just prudent with their cash!).
Popularity of Domain Extension
.LONDON most popular by large margin. We’ve placed .COM above .ORG.UK as all the .org.uk domains were party sites and two of the .com domains were dedicated campaign sites.
All the .London domains were dedicated campaign sites. It seems the new .london domain extension struck a chord with the majority of candidates as a way to express their links with the capital. There are 64,000 .london domains registered.
ntldstats.com reckons 60% of .london domains are ‘parked’, which means are not actively used. 2020Media is a registrar for domain names and can help you choose the best domain for your needs. Contact us if you would like to find out more.
Registration Date Analysis
Oldest domain: 10/2014 (sadiq.london)
Newest domain: 02/2016 (lee4mayor.com)
The oldest registered domain was much older than all the other campaign site domains by a long margin and is the only domain registered in 2014. The most recent domain was registered earlier this year. None of the domains have long registration periods, suggesting that they are single-purpose sites, or are on default 2 year renewal cycles.
None of the domains redirect or are aliases for an different underlying domain. This is good news, it means these domains are being properly used. We found that the websites for the candidates found using Google did not always reflect the domain names that the candidates put forward in their manifestos.
Our analysis found no great surprises here – the distribution of registrar (the company that manages the domain name) was widely in line with their market share.
Mayoral Candidate Domain Name Conclusions
We found the .LONDON domain names were a popular choice for candidates wishing to become the next Mayor of London. Most domains were registered specifically for the campaign and look unlikely to survive after the election.
We believe choosing the right domain name is an important part of marketing. This includes the extension (the dot whatever), and for this year’s London Mayor elections this has been born out by the choices the candidates have made.
The domains chosen are mostly descriptive, to the point, suggest relevance with the capital, and memorable.
Where candidates have only given their party website addresses, we think this was a missed opportunity for them personally, but may have longer term benefit to the party itself. Possibly this was deliberate – with the Mayoral election effectively a two horse race, generating publicity for the party rather than the candidate may have been the underlying aim of the promoter of the candidate.
Some of our customers may have received an email from email@example.com with a download link to an external website along with an USA telephone contact number. Please be advised that this is a phishing attempt and not sent or authorized by 2020Media. We have also discovered that a number of domain name registrars have also been affected by this. These emails are being sent to the registrant email address fetched via the whois record associated with the Domain.
We advise you to delete the email immediately.
If you are unsure of the validity of the emails please check the email headers to determine the source and return path for the email address. If you require any assistance or have any questions regarding the email please contact us via our customer portal – https://pfs.2020media.com/my-messages.html
Here is a sample of what the fraudulent messages look like.